Due to strategic reasons such as future-proofing the collection, changing legislation, and animal welfare concerns, the task arose to assess the enclosures and species of two canid species in the ARTIS collection.

The assessment of the enclosures involved a comparison with established international legal standards, which served as a minimal benchmark. This comparison encompassed a range of critical factors, including animal welfare indicators categorised within five distinct domains. These domains collectively provided a holistic view of the animals' well-being, encompassing physical health, environmental enrichment, and psychological state.

Furthermore, the assessment considered the population status of the species, both in situ (in their natural habitats) and ex-situ (in controlled environments like zoos). This dual perspective was crucial for understanding the broader conservation needs of the species and their representation in the zoo.

The FiveDomain model was the cornerstone for evaluating the welfare of the animals within their enclosures, as well as the effectiveness of the husbandry practices in place. This model offered a structured approach to scrutinize every aspect of the animals' care, from nutritional needs to environmental enrichment, ensuring that all aspects of their well-being were adequately addressed.

These assessments were instrumental in formulating strategic advice for the zoo's collection planning, ensuring that it not only meets the highest standards of animal welfare and legal compliance but also aligns with global conservation priorities.